ABSTRACT Introduction: Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HSCT) patients are exposed to acute and chronic nephrotoxic events (drugs, hypotension, infections, and microangiopathy). The need for hemodialysis (HD) may be associated with high mortality rates. However, the risk factors and clinical impact of HD are poorly understood. Aim: To analyze survival and risk factors associated with HD in allo-HSCT Patients and methods: single-center cohort study 185 (34 HD cases versus 151 controls) consecutive adult allo-HSCT patients from 2007-2019. We performed univariate statistical analysis, then logistic regression and competing risk regression were used to multivariate analysis. Survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: The one-year HD cumulative incidence was 17.6%. Univariate analysis revealed that HD was significantly associated with male gender, age (p 0.056), haploidentical donor, grade II-IV acute GVHD, polymyxin B, amikacin, cidofovir, microangiopathy, septic shock (norepinephrine use) and steroid exposure. The median days of glycopeptides exposure (teicoplanin/vancomycin) was 16 (HD) versus 10 (no HD) (p 0.088). In multivariate analysis, we found: norepinephrine (hazard ratio, HR:3.3; 95% confidence interval, 95%CI:1.2-8.9; p 0.024), cidofovir drug (HR:11.0; 95%CI:4.6 - 26.0; p < 0.001), haploidentical HSCT (HR:1.94; 95%CI:0.81-4.65; p 0.14) and Age (HR:1.01; 95%CI: 0.99-1.03; p 0.18). The HD group had higher mortality rate (HR:6.68; 95% CI: 4.1-10.9; p < 0.001). Conclusion: HD was associated with decreased survival in allo-HSCT. Carefully use of nephrotoxic drugs and improving immune reconstitution could reduce severe infections (shock) and patients requiring cidofovir, which taken together may result in lower rates of HD, therefore improving survival.

Abstract Introduction Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2* technique is used to assess iron overload in the heart, liver and pancreas of thalassaemic patients. Optimal iron chelation and expected tissue iron response rates remain under investigation. The objective of this study was to analyse serum ferritin and the iron concentration in the heart, liver and pancreas measured by MRI T2*/R2* during regular chelation therapy in a real-world cohort of patients with thalassemia. Methods We evaluated thalassaemic patients ≥ 7 years old undergoing chelation/transfusion therapy by MRI and assessed serum ferritin at baseline and follow-up from 2004-2011. Results We evaluated 136 patients, 92% major thalassaemic, with a median age of 18 years, and median baseline ferritin 2.033ng/ml (range: 59-14,123). Iron overload distribution was: liver (99%), pancreas (74%) and heart (36%). After a median of 1.2 years of follow-up, the iron overload in the myocardium reduced from 2,63 Fe mg/g to 2,05 (p 0.003). The optimal R2* pancreas cut-off was 148 Hertz, achieving 78% sensitivity and 73% specificity. However, when combining the R2* pancreas cut off ≤ 50 Hertz and a ferritin ≤ 1222 ng/ml, we could reach a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98% for cardiac siderosis. Only 28% were undergoing combined chelation at baseline assessment, which increased up to 50% on follow up evaluation. Conclusions Chelation therapy significantly reduced cardiac siderosis in thalassaemic patients. In patients with moderate/severe liver iron concentration undergoing chelation therapy, ferritin levels and myocardium iron improved earlier than the liver siderosis.

ABSTRACT Objective To analyze the karyotype test and myeloid panel with next-generation sequencing findings in patients with myelofibrosis, and to compare transplant characteristics in patients referred for bone marrow transplantation. Methods Retrospective, single-center study with patients diagnosed with myelofibrosis treated at Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein between 2010 and 2020. Results A total of 104 patients with myelofibrosis were examined. Patients who had not been submitted to tests in our service were excluded. The final sample comprised 69 patients. Of these 69, 56 were submitted to karyotyping and 22 to myeloid panel with next-generation sequencing. Karyotype was normal in 60% of the patients and altered in 40%. The prevalence of high-risk molecular mutations was higher in patients referred for bone marrow transplantation (100% versus 50%). The median follow-up of transplant patients was 2.4 years and the overall survival at 2 years was 80% (95%CI: 62-100%). Conclusion The molecular analysis enables estimating the patient’s risk and thus instituting more aggressive treatment such as bone marrow transplant for patients at higher risk, being a relevant tool to guide therapy. Given the significance of molecular analysis for therapeutic decision-making in myelofibrosis, collection and disclosure of data on the prevalence of cytogenetic changes and findings of next-generation sequencing in affected patients is important.

RESUMO CONTEXTO E OBJETIVOS: Há nove anos, hematologistas e oncologistas se reúnem anualmente em um simpósio educacional organizado por um hospital brasileiro e outro norte-americano. Durante o Board Review 2015, uma pesquisa foi conduzida entre os participantes e avaliou as diferenças na conduta e opções de tratamento para o mieloma múltiplo (MM). DESENHO E LOCAL: Estudo transversal no simpósio educacional de hematologia em São Paulo. MÉTODOS: Hematologistas presentes no simpósio responderam a uma pesquisa por celular. RESULTADOS: Dos 350 inscritos, 217 responderam o questionário. A maioria dos participantes acredita que a terapia-alvo imune (iTA) pode ser efetiva para desacelerar a progressão do MM em pacientes que já foram muito tratados previamente, e que a exposição contínua à terapia pode gerar clones resistentes em pacientes com MM (76%). A maioria usa terapia de manutenção após transplante de células-tronco hematopoiéticas (95%) e 45% dos médicos a restringiriam a pacientes pós-transplante com doença de base de alto risco. As drogas de primeira linha adotada para os pacientes inelegíveis para transplante (PIT) foram bortezomibe-talidomida-dexametasona (31%), bortezomibe-dexametasona (28%), lenalidomina-dexametasona (Rd; 17%) e terapia baseada em melfalan (10%). A lenalidomida foi a droga de escolha para a manutenção pós-transplante para metade dos participantes. Nenhuma diferença significativa foi encontrada para idade ou tempo de experiência. CONCLUSÃO: As escolhas de tratamento para PIT foram altamente heterogêneas e o regime baseado em melfalan representou somente 10% das opções de primeira linha. Terapia de manutenção após transplante é opção comum. Alguns dos resultados do levantamento foram divergentes das evidências na literatura.

ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: For the last nine years, hematologists and oncologists have gathered annually at an educational symposium organized by a Brazilian and an American hospital. During the 2015 Board Review, a survey among the attendees evaluated the differences in management and treatment methods for multiple myeloma (MM). DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study during an educational hematology symposium in São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: Hematologists present at the symposium gave responses to an electronic survey by means of mobile phone. RESULTS: Among the 350 attendees, 217 answered the questionnaire. Most of the participants believed that immunotargeting agents (iTA) might be effective for slowing MM progression in heavily pretreated patients (67%) and that continued exposure to therapy might lead to emergence of resistant clones in patients with MM (76%). Most of the physicians use maintenance therapy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (95%) and 45% of them would further restrict it to post-transplantation patients with underlying high-risk disease. The first-line drugs used for transplantation-ineligible patients (TI-MM) were bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (31%), bortezomib-dexamethasone (28%), lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd; 17%) and melphalan-based therapy (10%). Lenalidomide was the drug of choice for post-transplantation maintenance for half of the participants. No significant differences were observed regarding age or length of experience. CONCLUSION: The treatment choices for TI-MM patients were highly heterogenous and the melphalan-based regimen represented only 10% of the first-line options. Use of maintenance therapy after transplantation was a common choice. Some results from the survey were divergent from the evidence in the literature.

OBJETIVO: A tromboprofilaxia de rotina, a despeito de sua efetividade estar bem estabelecida e o tromboembolismo venoso ser uma condição potencialmente evitável, não se apresenta completamente consolidada na prática clínica. Os objetivos do presente estudo são: 1. Determinar a frequência da utilização da tromboprofilaxia e presença dos fatores de risco para tromboembolismo; 2. Verificar a adequação de sua utilização em pacientes clínicos internados, assumindo como parâmetro uma diretriz nacional estabelecida. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo transversal envolvendo pacientes internados por doenças clínicas em uma enfermaria geral de adultos de um hospital universitário. A análise foi baseada em diretriz definida. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 146 pacientes para análise. Destes, 94,5% possuíam pelo menos um fator de risco para tromboembolismo venoso. Em 130 (89%) pacientes havia indicação para uso de heparina profilática, sendo que em 73,3% dos casos estava prescrito algum tipo de heparina. Quanto à adequação da profilaxia, 53,4% das prescrições estavam corretas em relação à indicação e à dose da profilaxia; 24% apresentavam dose ou frequência incorretas; 19,2% não tinham prescrição de profilaxia, apesar de ela ser indicada; e em cinco casos (3,4%) o fármaco foi prescrito, apesar de não haver indicação. CONCLUSÃO: Existe subutilização da tromboprofilaxia nesta população, com inadequada dose prescrita em 50% dos casos. Portanto, estudos e intervenções futuros devem incluir um programa educacional que se inicie desde o atendimento em pronto-socorro, sendo essencial para aproximar a evidência à prática clínica.

OBJECTIVE: Routine thromboprophylaxis, despite its well-known effectiveness and the fact that venous thromboembolism is a potentially avoidable condition, is not fully established in clinical practice. The objectives of the present study were to determine how often thromboprophylaxis is used and the presence of thromboembolism risk factors, and to verify the appropriateness of its use in medical inpatients, assuming a long-standing national guideline as a parameter. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study, involving inpatients with medical conditions in the adult general ward of a university hospital. The review was based on a defined guideline. RESULTS: 146 patients were included in the review. At least one risk factor for venous thromboembolism was found in 94.5%. In 130 (89%) patients, prophylactic heparin was indicated, and some kind of heparin was prescribed in 73.3%. Regarding the adequacy of prophylaxis, 53.4% of prescriptions were correct regarding prophylaxis indication and dose; 24% had incorrect dose or frequency of use; 19.2% had no prophylaxis prescription, although it was indicated; and in five cases (3.4%), the drugwas prescribed, even though itwas not indicated. CONCLUSION: Thromboprophylaxis is underused in this population, and an inappropriate dose was prescribed in 50% of cases. Therefore, future studies and interventions should include an educational program started from the emergency department care, an essential step to bring evidence closer to clinical practice.